« January 2007 | Main | March 2007 »

Science of Grief

Richard died three months ago and just as I’m starting to expect things to get better, they seem to be getting worse.  Obviously, grief doesn’t operate on a linear curve.  The surprising thing is depression.  I’ve lived most of my life with people who have been officially diagnosed with depression, or probably should have been.  I never really understood it even though I tried and hope I was at least somewhat empathetic about it.

I’m a sanguine person, a glass-half-full, no-point-crying-over-spilled-milk, Sagittarian- with-a-smiley-sun-in-Jupiter-type of person.  I believe in letting go and getting on with it; making lemonade when life hands you lemons. But, in the past few weeks I’ve noticed a niggling sense of meaninglessness taking root … and rational thinking, counting my many blessings and working harder don’t seem to be making it go away. 

It’s hard to make sense of these feelings.  I have a rich life and hundreds of things I want to do.  I understand that there is a gaping hole in my life and expect to feel sad but meaninglessness puzzles me.  The only thing that’s different in my life is my husband is gone.  I still have work that challenges and engages me.   Art calls to me, young grandchildren delight me, the land around me lifts my spirit.  Which brings me back to depression and reminds me of conversations I’ve had with people who suffer from that condition and the lack of understanding I had for how they could possibly feel meaninglessness when they had so many things to live for.  I now have a tiny inkling of how they must feel and am very sorry that I wasn’t able to be more understanding before.

I guess depression shouldn’t have been a surprise and could possibly be seen as a positive sign since it’s the fourth stage of the grief cycle (Kubler-Roth’s model:  denial, anger, bargaining, depression, acceptance) however a new study from JAMA, supports some of the stage theory while also contradicting some basic elements.  Here’s a brief from the abstract:

Counter to stage theory, disbelief was not the initial, dominant grief indicator. Acceptance was the most frequently endorsed item and yearning was the dominant negative grief indicator from 1 to 24 months postloss. In models that take into account the rise and fall of psychological responses, once rescaled, disbelief decreased from an initial high at 1 month postloss, yearning peaked at 4 months postloss, anger peaked at 5 months postloss, and depression peaked at 6 months postloss. Acceptance increased throughout the study observation period. The 5 grief indicators achieved their respective maximum values in the sequence (disbelief, yearning, anger, depression, and acceptance) predicted by the stage theory of grief.

Yearning is the stage that replaces bargaining and feels much more appropriate for me.  But none of this seems to be clear “stages” but rather a blending of all of them at once with some getting bigger while others are getting smaller.  Right now yearning and depression seem to be getting bigger while disbelief is fading.  Anger is only occasionally peeking into the scene and acceptance is hopefully waiting in the wings.

The Creative Process

In 1955, French director, Henri-Georges Clouzot, filmed Picasso creating 20 artworks and this work is now in video format available from Netflix (The Mystery of Picasso).  One demonstration is available at http://www.dontforward.com/art-demo/blog.html.  It is Scène de tauromachie (Le torero soulevé) and here is the beginning point.

Picasso_1 What I found fasciating was watching the mind of the artist changing and playing until some internal vision finally matches the canvas.  Look at the end point below.  The video is only 2 minutes so you may want to watch the whole thing.

Picasso_2_scne_de_tauromachie

Perhaps We Should Try Creativity

Mark_jennings_daily At the end of his last blog post about why he joined the war in Iraq, Mark Daily asked his friends to, at least, wish him good luck even if they did not agree with his decision.  It's too late to wish him good luck since he and three of his comrades were killed by a roadside bomb on January 15th.  But, it's not too late to appreciate his decision and the obvious thought and passion that went into making it.

All of us who have grappled with our own views on this conflict know that there are no easy answers.  And, perhaps that's the thing that disturbs me most:  our politicians seem to act as if it were easy.  This administration acted as if there were a clear cut mandate and need for war in Iraq and marched forward before the raw pain of 9/11 could subside enough for us to make a reasoned decision.   Now, with the pendulum of power and public support swinging the other way, the call for ending the conflict and pulling out seems equally abrupt and possibly hazardous.

The decision to enter the war was clearly a crisis of creativity -- because we couldn't think of a better way, we did the same old thing ... and then wound up doing it poorly.  The losses are staggering not only for us but for the Iraqi people and perhaps the entire Middle East and the world as this cancer of violence increases and spreads.  But, will Iraq and the US and the rest of the world be served better by staying and surging, by our immediate withdrawal or by a new possibility that we haven't had the time and will power to think of yet?

If Congress ... and the rest of us ... could put aside our blame games and come to this highly loaded decision with an open mind and a clear commitment to serving the world rather than any of the myriad of special interests that make up this complicated mix, maybe we could find our way out of this mess in a way that would allow all of us to be proud of the ending, even if the beginning of this conflict has been forever tainted. 

If, like Mark Daily, each of us could dig deeply into our own beliefs and listen carefully to the thoughts and beliefs of others, perhaps we could find a better answer to the incredibly complex question of Iraq.  That would be one way to honor the sacrifice that Mark and thousands of other young men and women on both sides of this conflict made in the hopes of serving their countries.

You can read Mark's words below.

Continue reading "Perhaps We Should Try Creativity" »

What Would You Call It?

Gennlookingsouthhalekekai_sm If you could spend one minute watching a highly accomplished artist go from blank canvas to finished painting, what would you call it?  Robert Genn is one of the most generous, inspiring artists around.  Every week he puts out two messages filled with tips and techniques as well as reflections on life and art ... complete with visual examples, quotes and links.  It's by far my favorite newsletter.  Now Robert has started making one minute videos of his paintings and they are fascinating micro experiences of the creative process.  Check it out at: http://clicks.robertgenn.com/big-small.php.

The question is ... what would you call these creative capsules?  Robert is calling them Paint-O-Grams but I think that sounds harsh and commercial.  I've been trying to think of a name that captures the joy and magic of that transformation from white space to reality.  Maybe you can think of a name that captures that essence.  Please leave your suggestions in the comments section.

Saving Horses

Rescued_horsesHere's a short video that inspires and reminds us of the goodness of the human spirit and the power of leadership.  200 horses stranded on a small island were unable to make it to land, even when the waters subsided enough to cross safely.  However, with leadership ... well you need to watch the video.  I know I'm in an emotional state these days, but this one made me weep.  Be sure to turn up the sound.

http://video.google.nl/videoplay?docid=-4584913278289860160

Peace Plan

I recently came across this Peace Plan by Eddie Greenberg and it was so reminiscent of an earlier poem of mine, I wanted to share both.  Here's Eddie's plan (written a few years ago):

A Very Different and Alternative Peace Plan for the Holy Land:

Sharon, Arafat and Bush should be forced to sit in a circle in the middle of which is a large pile of dead Israeli and Palestinian babies.  They should sit in silence for 8 hours witnesssing what's before their eyes.  If no peace comes as a result of this experience, then as far as I'm concerned, Jesus, Moses, Mohammed and The One have "left the building."

My "Recipe for Ending War" is attached here.  Download recipe_for_ending_war.doc

Nature of the Human Species

Thinking that war is inevitable makes it so.  Thinking that the human species is naturally aggressive and prone to violence supports that idea that war is inevitable.  But what if we aren't the warlike, violent creatures we think we are?  In 1986, a group of scientists issued a UN statement that says, in part:

IT IS SCIENTIFICALLY INCORRECT to say that war or any other violent behaviour is genetically programmed into our human nature.

IT IS SCIENTIFICALLY INCORRECT to say that in the course of human evolution there has been a selection for aggressive behaviour more than for other kinds of behaviour.

So, what if war really is just a failure of imagination? 

The full statement is included below.

Continue reading "Nature of the Human Species" »